Sharing knowledge, skills and understanding.
Share experiences and opinions on methods, philosophies and practices we're using/ trialing internationally. Post a question or a response to our international community of educators.
Digizen.org, a reputable agency in the UK has produced a detailed report on social networking and its value for children. Young People and Social Networking Services was prepared for Childnet, which is an online child protection agency in the UK. The report gives a thorough overview and an review of the main social networking sites from MySpace to YouTube. It has a non-hysterical tone and the best part I think starts from page 10 with opportunities and barriers and risks. Summarised in this chart:
Opportunities for Education
Barriers and Risks
developing e-portfolios
educator's confidence and experience
literacy and communication skills
negative views of social networking
collaboration and group work
blocking policies
learn abot data protection and copyright
lack of digital literacy policy across schools
learn about self representation and presentation
lack of risk management tools
learn about e-safety
users misunderstanding the environment
public showcase for work
managing the risks
forming communities of practice
controlling your data
organising work - time management
intruding on yourn people's spaces
teachers being where learners are
bullying
illegal behaviour and content
spam
social pressure to be 'friends'
The tone of these is positive and suggest that schools need to be involved to take advantage of the benefits and to help children learn how to manage the risks for themselves.
This is a valuable report for school administrators who don't want to hide their heads in the social sand.
An interesting and necessary debate. With reference to using facebook as one of many mediums for a school/faculty/teacher to communicate I think a solution is the school/faculty/teacher has it's/their own page. As one of the contributors below wrote students and parents can become 'fans of' and keep up to date with the school and faculties. In terms of communicating with students one-one I suggest we continue with school webmail. My concern to friending students is opening up channels of uncertainty where educators may not be protected against unsolicited content that may be posted, in particular images of minors. Having said this i know settings could be set to not accept wall postings, etc. So I guess there are a number of options available for schools. Regards, N.B. Keen to here from more school as to the way they are dealing with this.
For some time I have been reading about the challenges social networking present to schools. Not the students in school, mind you. They have taken to social networking like ducks to water. But the adults are a different story and are largely playing catch-up. Some schools have responded by banning all of use social networking by students and employees. Others (a small number) are using social networking tools in interesting ways. Most seem to be in the middle, engaged in much hand wringing and asking colleagues in other schools:
What are YOU doing about Facebook and MySpace?
Do you have a policy we can look at?
Our faculty and staff are asking for guidance in this area. What do we tell them?
I don’t have the answer. But I do have some opinions, and I’d like to float them here to see what others have to say about them and then, in the best of social networking tradition, incorporate your suggestions into something that I can run by my colleagues. So here goes.
Proposed Guidelines for Use of Social Networks by School Faculty and Staff*
New technologies, such as social networking tools, provide exciting new ways to collaborate and communicate. Nevertheless we must exercise care to be sure we use such tools with students in ways that are both age-appropriate and consistent with the mission of the school.
School faculty and staff are expected to behave honorably in both real and virtual (online) spaces. Activities which are improper, unethical, illegal, or which cause undue discomfort for students, employees, parents, or other members of the school community should be judiciously avoided in both physical space and cyberspace.
To that end, we offer the following guidelines for school employees who use online social networking applications which may be frequented by current or former students.
COURSE USE OF SOCIAL NETWORKING: In order to provide equal, age-appropriate access for students to course materials, faculty should limit class activities to school-sanctioned online tools. New social networking tools and features are being continually introduced which may or may not be appropriate for course use. The same care must be taken in choosing such tools as other tools and support materials.
MODEL APPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR: Exercise appropriate discretion when using social networks for personal communications (friends, colleagues, parents, former students, etc.) with the knowledge that adult behavior on social networks may be used as a model by our students.
FRIENDING ALUMNI: Accept social network friend requests only with alumni over the age of 18. Do not initiate friend contacts with alumni.
UNEQUAL RELATIONSHIPS: Understand that the uneven power dynamics of the school, in which adults have authority over former students, continues to shape those relationships.
OTHER FRIENDS: Remind all other members of your network of your position as an educator whose profile may be accessed by current or former students, and to monitor their posts to your network accordingly. Conversely, be judicious in your postings to all friends sites, and act immediately to remove any material that may be inappropriate from your site whether posted by you or someone else.
GROUPS IN YOUR SOCIAL NETWORK: Associate with social networking groups consistent with healthy, pro-social activities and the mission and reputation of the school, acting with sensitivity within context of a diverse educational environment in which both students and adults practice tolerance and accept competing views.
PRIVACY SETTINGS AND CONTENT: Exercise care with privacy settings and profile content. Content should be placed thoughtfully and periodically reviewed to maintain this standard.
MISREPRESENTATION: Faculty who use social networks should do so using their own name, not a pseudonym or nickname.
PUBLIC INFORMATION: Recognize that many former students have online connections with current students, and that information shared between school adults and former students is likely to be seen by current students as well.
===
*Some of the ideas for this list come from a Facebook group I belong to, Faculty Ethics on Facebook. It is geared towards higher education, and so if you stumbled upon this post and really want to read about colleges and universities, head on over to Facebook. I also appreciate colleague Matt Montagne’s feedback via Google Docs on an earlier draft of these ideas.
Digizen.org, a reputable agency in the UK has produced a detailed report on social networking and its value for children. Young People and Social Networking Services was prepared for Childnet, which is an online child protection agency in the UK. The report gives a thorough overview and an review of the main social networking sites from MySpace to YouTube. It has a non-hysterical tone and the best part I think starts from page 10 with opportunities and barriers and risks. Summarised in this chart:
